Woodblock is the earliest form of printing, originating in China before the year 200. Today, many artists are still creating woodblock prints on both fabric and paper.
Karen Kunc is a Nebraska artist whose contemporary woodblock prints have been highly acclaimed for their rich use of color and shape. Like photographers who are using antiquated processes on contemporary subjects, Kunc is using the ancient woodblock process to make prints that are clearly rooted in a Modern aesthetic.
http://davidsongalleries.com/artists/kunc/kunc-wanting_pool.jpg The Wanting Pool, 2007
Although digital photography makes it easier and faster than ever to create clean, commercialized photographs, many fine art photographers continue to use non-digital photographic processes in their work. In fact, many are even uniting digital and non-digital processes to create more dynamic images than ever before thought possible.
Ironically, like many other “antique” art forms, non-digital photography seems to be valued by artists for the same reasons many commercial photographers are discarding it in favor of its digitized cousin—it’s often slow, difficult, and highly error-prone, as photographer Sally Mann illustrates to in this video of her using the wet-plate collodion process in an 8x10 camera (a-la US Civil War era photography):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o62-YMQHeoI
Tintypes made portraits relatively inexpensive in the 19th century, and today, many artists are using the process to create unique, eerie portraits once again, despite the apparent difficulty of the process. Here are some examples by contemporary artists who are going back to the tintype process:
http://www.andersonstaley.com/users/KeliyAndersonStaley4060/images/KeliyAndersonStaley4060415411.jpg Keliy Anderson Staley
A self portrait taken with a 4x5 camera and hand tinted after being printed "the old fashioned way" in a wet darkroom.
So, why is it, then, that so many photographers continue to use these "outdated" processes in their work? Although these processes take longer and can be considerably more labor-intensive than creating digital photographs, it's obvious that their results are very different from digital photographic processes. The aesthetic of a tintype or hand-tinted silver gelatin print is vastly different from that of an inkjet print from a digital file. While some photographers may be trying to capture an image that looks like its from the past, others are photographing distinctly contemporary subjects with distinctly antique processes. Such a combination may be a way for photographers to set themselves apart and create unique work.
Check out these links for more interesting photographic processes:
While the digitization of print has intensified the speed and accuracy of printing, many printing companies have instead been using antique, analog letterpress technology to create stylized, unique objects.
"Letterpress Printing is a relief printing process in which a raised image is inked to produce an impression; the impression is then transferred by placing paper against image and applying pressure.
Since each piece is created individually, slight variations in color and registration are possible" (Moontree Letterpress).
What's really interesting about this movie, is that it's clearly a contemporary film, but it's implementing some very old-fashioned film techniques. While the film is obviously silent, it's also using some very silent-genre-specific slapstick-style moves and highly dramatized body language. This intensifies the effect of the silent genre, but because its shot in color and in modern settings, the film has a completely fresh, very creative feel.
Just to get the ball rolling, let's take a look at how one of the greatest "antique technologies" has been used for strictly artistic purposes:
Many modern/contemporary artists (especially after 1945) began "re appropriating" everyday objects and technologies like books to make statements about the role of knowledge and learning in society. Here are a few great examples:
http://www.tate.org.uk/collection/T/T02/T02072_9.jpg John Latham Five Sisters Bing 1976
http://www.ps1.org/images/exhibition/large/2006/Fall2006/John%20Latham/Philosophy%20and%20the%20Practic%20copy.jpg John Latham Philosophy and the Practice of 1960
http://media2.moma.org/collection_images/resized/455/w500h420/CRI_128455.jpg Lucas Samaras Book 1968